For Reviewers
- Confidentiality: All manuscripts and related correspondence must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share or discuss the content outside the review process.
- Objective and Constructive Review: Reviewers should provide impartial, thorough, and constructive feedback based on the scientific content, without personal criticism or bias.
- Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers are expected to assess the manuscript’s originality, scientific rigor, clarity, methodology, data interpretation, ethical compliance, and relevance to the field.
- Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any financial, personal, or professional conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality before accepting the assignment.
- Timely Review: Reviewers should complete their assessment within the agreed timeframe to ensure the efficiency and integrity of the editorial process.
- Recommendation: Reviewers should provide a clear recommendation (accept, revise, or reject) supported by specific comments to guide the authors and assist the editorial decision-making process.
